← All open source projects

TanStack Query

TanStack/query

TanStack Query is a library for async state, server data, caching, and synchronization in web applications.

Forks 3,903
Author TanStack
Language TypeScript
License Unknown
Synced 2026-06-27

What it is

TanStack Query is a library for async state and server data in web applications.

The project grew from React Query, but became part of the broader TanStack ecosystem and supports different frameworks.

TanStack Query’s main task is to remove manual work around loading, cache, errors, refetching, and synchronization with the server.

What is inside the repository

The repository links to documentation, involvement, partners, and other TanStack projects.

The library is used where the interface constantly reads and updates data: dashboards, account areas, editors, catalogs, and SaaS apps.

How people usually use it

A normal scenario is to describe a query key, a loading function, and use returned states inside a component.

For a team, this helps separate server data from local UI state and avoid writing the same loading code on every screen.

A request as UI state

This example shows the TanStack Query model: data, loading, error, and cache live around one query key.

Language: React TSX
const { data, isLoading } = useQuery({
  queryKey: ['todos'],
  queryFn: () => fetch('/api/todos').then((r) => r.json()),
});

What it feels like in practice

The project’s strength is caching and data resynchronization built into the library model.

Another advantage is the mature TanStack ecosystem and support for different UI stacks.

Limits and careful spots

The limitation is that the library requires understanding keys, invalidation, and cache boundaries. Without that, stale data or extra requests can appear.

TanStack Query also does not replace API design or the server data model.

Who it fits

TanStack Query best fits applications where server data actively shapes the interface.

In the catalog, TanStack Query matters as a project that made request handling a real engineering layer rather than a pile of random useEffect calls.

In long-term work with a project like this, installation is not the only concern: the team needs a clear boundary of responsibility, an update routine, and an owner for usage rules.

In practice, this means running a minimal example before adoption, checking configuration, reviewing updates, and understanding which data or processes are touched. That short pass quickly shows where the project helps immediately and where the team still needs its own decisions.

If the project becomes part of a public site, product, or internal platform, it should be recorded in team documentation: source link, version, owner, and update rhythm. Then the open code remains a managed dependency rather than a random fragment of infrastructure.